In Offended by Irvine Welsh the Scottish writer explores the effect of ‘cancel culture’ on artistic expression, and questions whether art should be allowed to cause offence. The Sky Arts documentary aired in November, and features a series of interviews with artists who feel negatively impacted by cancellation or ‘woke’ culture, interspersed with Welsh sharing his own views. The interviewees include artist Jake Chapman, author Nadifa Mohamed, and comedian Geoff Norcott.
Between interviews held in studios, libraries and pubs, Welsh builds a case against what he views as censorship. “Silence is inertia,” he says in a voice over. When artists are afraid of offending their audience, they self-censor. If offensive art is criticised or ‘cancelled’ through channels like social media (the main antagonist of the documentary) then, he argues, it is a restriction on free speech. However, Welsh’s stance is somewhat ironic. The documentary prioritises the right of artists to freedom of expression, but challenges the right of an audience to participate in the same thing. If someone specifically sets out to provoke their audience, as multiple artists in the documentary say they do, then surely a level of controversy means that they have succeeded. A silencing of audience criticism would lead to the same level of ‘inertia’ as self-censoring artists. While art is firstly a creative expression, how it is received by its audience is what, arguably, creates the impact.
Social media, rather than making people more easily offended, has simply made it possible for more people to get their opinions heard. While exhibitions or films used to be reviewed in newspaper columns or a handful of blogs, now anyone can comment and potentially reach the same amount of people as any celebrity or traditional critic. Welsh says that social media is “undemocratic” – I would argue that it is anything but. As artists now face judgement from this much wider circle, they must, of course, consider how this affects them. However, arguing for their own freedom of expression but feeling attacked when other people use theirs, especially when the artist has specifically set out to cause controversy, is not a fair solution. If everyone must have the ‘freedom to question and to offend’, as the documentary states in a dramatic conclusion, then that right should be extended to the audience as much as the artist.
If art has the right to offend, then the audience must also have the right to be offended.
Featured image: WendyWei.pexels With the most anticipated night of the year right around the corner, the big question is looming: where are you going to celebrate it? Whether you dread it or count down the days, are new to the Manchester nightlife scene or are a regular, we’ve got your New Year’s Eve plans sorted….
By Georgia Robinson Featured image and gallery: Ruby Sharp Get one step ahead of your 2025 aesthetic and plan your outfits for the new year with this guide to all the trends we expect to see next year. Why not jazz up your wardrobe with trending accessories or browse Depop and Vinted for a pre-loved…
Featured image and gallery: Kaitlyn Brockley The rumble of trains passing through Piccadilly station, the hollers of touts (“tickets, buy or sell?”) and security (“have your IDs ready”), and the excitable chatter of gig-goers all audibly backdrop the outskirts of Manchester’s Mayfield Depot this dark, damp evening. Leaving the outside chill and travelling along the…
Featured image and gallery: Leo Woollison Crook Angela Cheveau and Kate Carne were crowned winners of the 2024 QuietManDave Prize on Friday. The short-form writing prize is held biennially to honour the memory of the much-loved and well-known Manchester writer and critic Dave Murray, who passed away in 2019. The writers were each awarded £1000…
Leave a reply